Latest
Law Week Subscribe

What the SRA's Role Actually Is in Regulating Solicitors

The Solicitors Regulation Authority exists to protect the public and uphold trust in legal services, but its remit has firm boundaries that are often misunderstood.

Automated report. This article was drafted with AI assistance from the sources listed below, without a human writing step. Law Week labels every article produced this way. A person is answerable for it: if something here is wrong, write to editor@lawweek.co.uk and we will correct it on the page and say what changed.

A regulator, not a trade body

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is the independent body responsible for regulating solicitors and law firms in England and Wales. It is easy to confuse the SRA with the Law Society, and historically they were the same organisation, but they were split apart so that the Law Society could represent and support solicitors as a profession while the SRA focused solely on regulation in the public interest.

That separation matters. The SRA does not exist to promote solicitors’ interests, defend their reputation, or lobby government on their behalf. Its job is to make sure the public, and the justice system more broadly, can trust that people calling themselves solicitors are competent, honest, and properly supervised. Where the interests of the profession and the interests of the public diverge, the SRA’s statutory purpose points it towards the public.

Where its authority comes from

The SRA’s powers do not come from nowhere. It operates under the framework set out in the Legal Services Act, which created a tier of oversight above all the frontline legal regulators. Sitting above the SRA is the Legal Services Board, which approves the SRA’s rules, monitors its performance, and can intervene if a regulator is not meeting its statutory objectives. Those objectives include things like protecting and promoting the public interest, supporting the rule of law, protecting consumers, and encouraging a strong, independent and diverse legal profession.

This layered structure means the SRA is not simply making up its own rules. Significant changes to how it regulates, and often the standards it sets, have to be justified against those statutory objectives and can be scrutinised by the Legal Services Board.

Who and what falls within its remit

The SRA’s regulatory reach covers solicitors, registered European and foreign lawyers, and the law firms authorised by it, whether they are traditional partnerships, LLPs, or alternative business structures with non-lawyer ownership. If you are dealing with someone who describes themselves as a solicitor practising in England and Wales, the SRA is very likely the body with oversight of them.

But the SRA’s authority stops at its own regulated population. Barristers are regulated separately by the Bar Standards Board. Legal executives fall under CILEx Regulation. Licensed conveyancers, patent attorneys and costs lawyers each have their own dedicated regulator. And a large amount of legal and quasi-legal work in England and Wales, such as most will-writing or general legal advice given outside a regulated firm, is not reserved activity at all, meaning anyone can offer it without SRA oversight. Understanding this patchwork matters because consumers sometimes assume any adviser using legal language is regulated, when they may not be.

Setting the standards

A large part of the SRA’s role is defining what acceptable conduct looks like before problems arise, not just responding after the fact. It does this through the Standards and Regulations, built around a set of core Principles covering things like acting with integrity, independence, and in the best interests of clients, alongside more detailed Codes of Conduct for individuals and for firms.

These standards touch on areas such as client confidentiality, conflicts of interest, competence, and how firms are run and supervised. The SRA also sets requirements around qualification, including oversight of the route into the profession, and around ongoing competence once someone is practising.

Protecting client money and public confidence

One of the most consumer-facing parts of the SRA’s role is safeguarding money that clients hand over to solicitors, for example in property transactions or when holding funds during a dispute. The SRA requires firms to keep client money separate from the firm’s own funds and imposes strict rules on how it is handled. It also oversees compensation arrangements that can step in if a firm fails and client money is missing, giving the public a safety net that would not exist with an unregulated adviser.

This is part of a wider theme in the SRA’s role: making regulation matter for someone who has never read a rulebook. A member of the public does not need to understand the detail of the Standards and Regulations to benefit from them. They benefit because a solicitor’s title signals that someone else has already checked the basics are in place.

The limits of what regulation can promise

It is worth being clear about what the SRA’s role does not include. It is not a customer service line for complaints about service quality or fees, which generally sit with the Legal Ombudsman instead. It does not guarantee outcomes in legal disputes, and being regulated does not mean every solicitor is excellent, only that a floor of standards and accountability exists.

For anyone dealing with a solicitor or law firm, checking current rules on client money protection, firm authorisation, or a specific solicitor’s standing should always be done directly with the SRA, since the detail of rules and thresholds changes over time even though the underlying role of the regulator stays consistent.

Where to check current detail

For up-to-date rules, the SRA’s own register and Standards and Regulations are the primary source, alongside guidance from the Law Society on the profession and the Legal Services Board on the wider oversight framework.

Sources