<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Law Week: Opinion</title><description>Analysis and comment on the business of law.</description><link>https://www.lawweek.co.uk/</link><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 16:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><managingEditor>editor@lawweek.co.uk (Law Week)</managingEditor><webMaster>editor@lawweek.co.uk (Law Week)</webMaster><copyright>Copyright 2026 Law Week</copyright><ttl>60</ttl><atom:link href="https://www.lawweek.co.uk/opinion/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>What should legal automation actually replace?</title><link>https://www.lawweek.co.uk/what-should-legal-automation-actually-replace/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lawweek.co.uk/what-should-legal-automation-actually-replace/</guid><description>The debate keeps asking how much of the solicitor can be automated away. Dan Yeo argues that is the wrong question, and that the real opportunity is removing the process that surrounds their expertise rather than the expertise itself.</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 16:30:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Dan Yeo</dc:creator><media:content url="https://www.lawweek.co.uk/images/what-should-legal-automation-actually-replace.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/><media:thumbnail url="https://www.lawweek.co.uk/images/what-should-legal-automation-actually-replace.jpg"/><category>Opinion</category></item><item><title>When drafting is commoditised, judgement is the product</title><link>https://www.lawweek.co.uk/the-commoditisation-of-legal-drafting-an-opinion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lawweek.co.uk/the-commoditisation-of-legal-drafting-an-opinion/</guid><description>If machines can produce a competent first draft of almost anything, what is a lawyer actually being paid for? An argument about where the value now sits.</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 06:30:02 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Law Week</dc:creator><media:content url="https://www.lawweek.co.uk/images/the-commoditisation-of-legal-drafting-an-opinion.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/><media:thumbnail url="https://www.lawweek.co.uk/images/the-commoditisation-of-legal-drafting-an-opinion.jpg"/><category>Opinion</category></item><item><title>When AI can draft anything, reputation is the last moat left</title><link>https://www.lawweek.co.uk/reputation-is-the-last-moat-in-an-age-of-commoditised-drafting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lawweek.co.uk/reputation-is-the-last-moat-in-an-age-of-commoditised-drafting/</guid><description>As machines commoditise the mechanics of legal work, trust, brand and named authority become the only differentiators a firm cannot be undercut on.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:05:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Sam Allcock</dc:creator><media:content url="https://www.lawweek.co.uk/images/reputation-is-the-last-moat-in-an-age-of-commoditised-drafting.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/><media:thumbnail url="https://www.lawweek.co.uk/images/reputation-is-the-last-moat-in-an-age-of-commoditised-drafting.jpg"/><category>Opinion</category></item><item><title>The billable hour isn&apos;t dying, but the firms clinging to it are</title><link>https://www.lawweek.co.uk/the-billable-hour-isnt-dying-but-the-firms-clinging-to-it-are/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lawweek.co.uk/the-billable-hour-isnt-dying-but-the-firms-clinging-to-it-are/</guid><description>AI is collapsing the time it takes to do legal work, and firms that still sell time by the hour are quietly pricing themselves out of their own efficiency.</description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 07:40:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Sam Allcock</dc:creator><media:content url="https://www.lawweek.co.uk/images/the-billable-hour-isnt-dying-but-the-firms-clinging-to-it-are.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/><media:thumbnail url="https://www.lawweek.co.uk/images/the-billable-hour-isnt-dying-but-the-firms-clinging-to-it-are.jpg"/><category>Opinion</category></item><item><title>Most law firms still market like it&apos;s 2005, and the sharp ones are quietly eating their lunch</title><link>https://www.lawweek.co.uk/most-law-firms-still-market-like-its-2005/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lawweek.co.uk/most-law-firms-still-market-like-its-2005/</guid><description>The brochure-and-directory playbook still dominates legal marketing, yet the firms winning the best work have swapped it for something closer to publishing.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 08:15:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Sam Allcock</dc:creator><media:content url="https://www.lawweek.co.uk/images/most-law-firms-still-market-like-its-2005.jpg" medium="image" type="image/jpeg"/><media:thumbnail url="https://www.lawweek.co.uk/images/most-law-firms-still-market-like-its-2005.jpg"/><category>Opinion</category></item></channel></rss>